Bosnia and Herzegovina's Progress and Recent Impact
Key Insights
Latest Emissions At A Glance
Bosnia and Herzegovina's latest emissions total 26.9 megatonnes of CO2‑equivalent. While this is a very small share of the global total, the footprint per person is 8.5 tonnes per capita per year, which rates as Very High on our scale. This contrast underscores that national size and per‑capita impact tell different stories, with the latter needing to move close to zero.
What Drives The Total
Fossil CO2 dominates the profile, accounting for roughly three quarters of emissions, with coal as the single largest source-around half of the national total. Oil‑related CO2 is the next sizable contributor, whereas gas and other fossil sources are minor. Methane forms about a fifth of emissions, led by fugitive releases from the energy system; agriculture and waste add smaller portions. N2O contributes a modest share, F‑gases are marginal, and land‑use CO2 is near neutral.
Ten-Year Trend In Context
Over the past decade, total emissions have edged down only slightly-around half a percent per year-well short of the ~4% annual decline consistent with a net‑zero‑by‑2050 global pathway. Within the mix, coal‑related CO2 has been easing, while oil‑related CO2 has crept up. Methane has declined overall, primarily due to lower fugitive emissions, with waste methane rising. N2O has eased modestly, and F‑gases are increasing from a low base.
Actionable Priorities This Decade
To bring a Very High per‑capita footprint down rapidly, focus on the biggest levers: accelerate reductions in coal‑based CO2, restrain growth in oil‑related CO2, and continue cutting methane from energy operations. Preserve the near‑neutral land‑use balance, and contain growth in waste methane and F‑gases. The largest and quickest gains are most likely from coal and energy‑sector methane, with sustained attention to oil.
Background
Recent per Capita Emissions
The Recent per Capita Emissions are a crucial indicator of a nation's greenhouse gas emissions. They are a fair measure for comparing the emissions of nations, taking into account the size of their populations.
Because any greenhouse gas emissions above 0 cause warming, the per capita emissions shouldn't be judged against the global average; they should be compared based on how far they are above 0. Therefore, our rating scale is:
- Extremely High: above 10 tonnes per capita per year
- Very High: above 7.5 tonnes
- High: above 5 tonnes
- Moderate: above 2.5 tonnes
- Low: above 0 tonnes
- Negative Emissions: under 0
The per capita emissions should be close to zero for each country, indicated here by the green & low areas.
Last Year Emissions
This is the total amount of CO2, CH4, N2O, and F-Gases emissions of a nation in 2023 (last available year in the data) expressed in megatonnes of CO2-equivalents. The gases have different atmospheric lifetimes (decay) and warming effects, for this reason, we use the GWP100 (100 year time horizon method) to calculate the global warming potential of CH4, N2O, and F-Gases to express them in CO2-equivalents.
Wikipedia: Global Warming PotentialLast Year Share
This is a nation's share of the global emissions in 2023 (last available year in the data). For many countries this value can be quite small, especially when compared to nations like United States or China. It is easy and dangerous to jump to the conclusion that small shares of emissions don't matter. They matter as a group. Even small emitters can account for a significant amount of total emissions. Consider the following examples:
- 24 nations, each between 0.5 and 1.5% of the total emissions, make up 20% of the total emissions.
- 27 nations, each between 0.5 and 2% of the total emissions, make up 25% of the total emissions.
- 162 nations with a share below 0.5% make up 15% of the total.
- 3 nations, make 44% of the total emissions: China, United States and India. However, China and India together have a population of about 2.9 billion.
Per Capita Emissions are therefore the most crucial indicator to represent the impact of a nation regardless of its size.
Yearly Emissions Trend
This is a nation's trend per year over the last 10 years. It is a good indicator of the trajectory of national emissions and can be used as a simple framework to judge a nation's trend vs. international goals:
- Stop warming around 1.5 °C: All nations together, and each nation, should drop emissions by 17% per year — 8,000 Megatonnes of CO2 Equivalent per Year.
- To achieve Net Zero in 2050 and to stop warming at ~1.7 °C: All nations should together, and each nation, should drop emissions by 4% per year — 2,100 Megatonnes of CO2 Equivalent per Year.
- Additionally, to return warming to pre-industrial levels almost all human-induced CO2 has to be taken out of the atmosphere.
About the Data
The last available year in all the emission datasets is 2023. CO2 emissions data is from the Global Carbon Project. It contains national CO2 emissions from fossil sources and land-use change. Emissions from CH4, N2O and F-gases come from the PRIMAP-Hist dataset. It is a rich dataset that combines several published sources to create a historical emissions time series for various greenhouse gases. Population data are also from Global Carbon Project where available, however, for many nations it doesn't have historic population going back to 1850. Those historic gaps are filled with population data from Our World in Data.
The Key Insights paragraph was created using a large language model (LLM) in combination with our data, historic events, and a structured approach for best accuracy by separating the context generation from the interpretation and narrative.
Data Sources
Global Carbon Budget 2024 Global Carbon Budget
Update cycle: yearlyDelay: ~ 10 months after the end of the year. Current year values are estimated and published in November.Credits: Friedlingstein et al., 2024, ESSD. Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Li, H., Luijkx, I. T., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Schwingshackl, C., Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S. R., Arneth, A., Arora, V., Bates, N. R., Becker, M., Bellouin, N., Berghoff, C. F., Bittig, H. C., Bopp, L., Cadule, P., Campbell, K., Chamberlain, M. A., Chandra, N., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Colligan, T., Decayeux, J., Djeutchouang, L., Dou, X., Duran Rojas, C., Enyo, K., Evans, W., Fay, A., Feely, R. A., Ford, D. J., Foster, A., Gasser, T., Gehlen, M., Gkritzalis, T., Grassi, G., Gregor, L., Gruber, N., Gürses, Ö., Harris, I., Hefner, M., Heinke, J., Hurtt, G. C., Iida, Y., Ilyina, T., Jacobson, A. R., Jain, A., Jarníková, T., Jersild, A., Jiang, F., Jin, Z., Kato, E., Keeling, R. F., Klein Goldewijk, K., Knauer, J., Korsbakken, J. I., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre, N., Liu, Z., Liu, J., Ma, L., Maksyutov, S., Marland, G., Mayot, N., McGuire, P., Metzl, N., Monacci, N. M., Morgan, E. J., Nakaoka, S.-I., Neill, C., Niwa, Y., Nützel, T., Olivier, L., Ono, T., Palmer, P. I., Pierrot, D., Qin, Z., Resplandy, L., Roobaert, A., Rosan, T. M., Rödenbeck, C., Schwinger, J., Smallman, T. L., Smith, S., Sospedra-Alfonso, R., Steinhoff, T., Sun, Q., Sutton, A. J., Séférian, R., Takao, S., Tatebe, H., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., Torres, O., Tourigny, E., Tsujino, H., Tubiello, F., van der Werf, G., Wanninkhof, R., Wang, X., Yang, D., Yang, X., Yu, Z., Yuan, W., Yue, X., Zaehle, S., Zeng, N., and Zeng, J.: Global Carbon Budget 2024, Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-519, in review, 2024.
PRIMAP-hist The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series (1750-2023)
Update cycle: Every few monthsDelay: Less than 1 yearCredits: Gütschow, Johannes; Busch, Daniel; Pflüger, Mika (2024): The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series (1750-2023) v2.6. Zenodo.
Our World in Data Population - Our World in Data
Update cycle: YearlyDelay: 7 monthsCredits: HYDE (2023); Gapminder (2022); UN WPP (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data